Legal Opinion

Borst v. Borst

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 1936No. 2581Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By THE COURT

The above entitled cause is presented in this court as an error proceeding from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations, of Franklin County, Ohio.

The final order from which error might be prosecuted was journalized on March 5, 1935. The petition in error was filed in this court on July 26, 1935, and it thereby appears that more than seventy days liad elapsed between the final order and the filing of the petition in error.

It follows that this court has no jurisdiction to hear or determine the cause.

Counsel for plaintiff in error evidently had in mind…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Guardianship of GausepohlOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Neth, Exr. v. NethOhio Court of Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API