Legal Opinion
State v. Sullivan
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 25, 2014No. 11AP-414PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as State v. Sullivan,
2014-Ohio-673.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : v. : No. 11AP-414 (C.P.C. No. 10CR-04-2266) Anthony L. Sullivan, : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Defendant-Appellant. : D E C I S I O N Rendered on February 25, 2014 Ron O'Brien, Prosecuting Attorney, and Laura R. Swisher, for appellee. Anthony L. Sullivan, pro se. ON APPLICATION FOR REOPENING CONNOR, J. {¶ 1} On March 5, 2013, defendant-appellant, Anthony L. Sullivan ("defendant"), filed a pro se application pursuant to App.R. 26(B) seeking to reopen his appeal…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. MurnahanOhio Supreme Court · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. LongOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. WalkerOhio Court of Appeals · 2025