Legal Opinion

Safeco Insurance v. Victoria

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 24, 1998No. WCB Nos. 95-08855 and 95-08856; CA A96213PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.

Safeco Insurance (Safeco) seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) assigning it responsibility for claimant’s bilateral arm condition. We review for errors of law, substantial evidence and abuse of discretion. ORS 656.298(7); ORS 183.482(7), (8). We reverse and remand for reconsideration.

In November 1994, claimant began suffering bilateral arm symptoms while working at Safeco doing repetitious computer input work. In February 1995, claimant left Safeco and took a job with a SAIF-insured employer (Wilson-Heir-good). Her duties there included typing, initially minimal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roseburg Forest Products v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Norstadt v. Murphy Plywood/Liberty Northwest InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Willamette Industries, Inc. v. TitusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnston v. Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API