Safeco Insurance v. Victoria
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.
Safeco Insurance (Safeco) seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) assigning it responsibility for claimant’s bilateral arm condition. We review for errors of law, substantial evidence and abuse of discretion. ORS 656.298(7); ORS 183.482(7), (8). We reverse and remand for reconsideration.
In November 1994, claimant began suffering bilateral arm symptoms while working at Safeco doing repetitious computer input work. In February 1995, claimant left Safeco and took a job with a SAIF-insured employer (Wilson-Heir-good). Her duties there included typing, initially minimal…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Roseburg Forest Products v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Norstadt v. Murphy Plywood/Liberty Northwest InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Willamette Industries, Inc. v. TitusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
3Cited by1 opinion
- Johnston v. Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000