Legal Opinion

Omaha Steel Works v. Martin

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 25, 1926No. 11,300PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Allen

This cause is a consolidation of four actions, each upon a promissory note. The verdicts and judgments were for defendants, respectively. The Omaha Steel Works was the plaintiff in each case, and it brings the four cases, consolidated, here for review.

Each note in question was made and executed by one of the defendants, in the fall of 1920, and delivered to the payee, the Zonta Tire & Rubber Company, a concern which, according to the representations of its agents, intended to engage in the manufacture of automobile tires at Sioux City, Iowa. The business, however, was never established.

Accordi…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hukill v. McGinnisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  2. Delaney v. BrownwoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. River Bros. v. C.F.T. Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928
  2. National Bank of the Republic v. BecksteadUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Abley v. DaviesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  4. Continental National Bank v. ColeIdaho Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API