Legal Opinion
Village Bridge Apts. v. Mammucari
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 14, 1990PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
239 N.J. Super. 235 (1990)
570 A.2d 1301
VILLAGE BRIDGE APARTMENTS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
CAROL MAMMUCARI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 14, 1990.
Decided March 14, 1990.
Before Judges DREIGHAN and R.S. COHEN.
Justin T. Loughry argued the cause for appellant (Tomar, Simonoff, Adourian & O'Brien, attorneys).
Randolph I. Conn argued the cause for respondent (Greenblatt & Lieberman, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by R.S. COHEN, J.A.D.
Defendant has rented an apartment in plaintiff's complex for some 16 years. In October 1988…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- 447 ASSOCIATES v. MirandaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Stanger v. RidgewayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- Hill Manor Apartments v. BromeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Edgemere at Somerset v. JohnsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Vineland Shopping Center, Inc. v. De MarcoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sudersan v. RoyalNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Hale v. FarrakhanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- Fromet Properties, Inc. v. BuelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Muros v. MoralesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Hanover Mobile Home Owners Ass'n v. Hanover Village AssociatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.