Legal Opinion

Hermance v. Braun

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1939Published

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

Defendant’s, first' contention is that the trial court erred in setting aside the certificate, deed, and satisfaction prior to sale under the judgment of partition for the reason that only a sale would determine that the interest secured by plaintiff upon execution, was of no value. Defendant suggests that to further the .possibility of liquidating her interests for cash the mother of defendant might waive or discount some of her lien rights,'.but this is pure conjecture. The record discloses that claims superior to plaintiff’s interest are considerably greater in ainount than the value of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bennett v. ChildWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865
  2. DeLoach Mill Manufacturing Co. v. Little Rock Mill & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1898
  3. First National Bank v. RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  4. Kinports v. OberiioltzerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  5. Reed v. FisherNebraska Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API