Legal Opinion

People v. Moores

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1847PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Debt on a bastardy bond in the penalty of $500, conditioned that the defendant Daniel B. Moores, the father of the child, would indemnify the city of New-York, where the child had been bom, and every other county, &c. which might be put to any expense for the support of the child, or of its mother during i her confinement and recovery therefrom, against all such expenses.

Read the full summary

Debt on a bastardy bond in the penalty of $500, conditioned that the defendant Daniel B. Moores, the father of the child, would indemnify the city of New-York, where the child had been bom, and every other county, &c. which might be put to any expense for the support of the child, or of its mother during i her confinement and recovery therefrom, against all such expenses. Breach, that the defendant had not indemnified the city of New-York, &c. and the city, after the making of the bond, had been obliged to expend divers large sums of money for the support of the child, &c. Plea, by the…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Bronson, Ch. J.

When an infant is under a legal obligation to do an act, he may bind himself by a fair and reasonable contract made for the purpose of discharging the obligation. If this be not a general rule, it is at the least one of pretty wide application, as a few examples will prove. An infant is bound to pay a judgment, or a debt contracted for necessaries; and he may make a valid promise to refund the money to any one who will satisfy the judgment or debt. (Clarke v. Leslie, 5 Esp. R. 28; Randall v. Sweet, 1 Denio, 460.) An infant is under a legal obligation to provide…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Randall v. SweetCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  2. Winslow v. AndersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re PreslerNew York Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Berry v. SeawallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  3. Weinberg v. Omar E.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Inhabitants of Bordentown v. WallaceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1887
  5. Barker v. HibbardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1874

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API