Orloski v. Planning Bd.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
234 N.J. Super. 1 (1989)
559 A.2d 1380
FRANK ORLOSKI AND THELMA ORLOSKI, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
PLANNING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF SHIP BOTTOM, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 15, 1989.
Decided May 30, 1989.
Before Judges SHEBELL, GRUCCIO and LANDAU.
Thomas C. McCoy argued the cause for appellants (Woodland & McCoy, attorneys; Thomas C. McCoy, on the brief).
Granville D. Magee argued the cause for respondent (Magee and Graham, attorneys; Granville D. Magee, of counsel and on the brief).
2Per curiam
We affirm substantially for the reasons ably expressed by Judge…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- North Plainfield v. PeroneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Cohen v. Fair LawnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- DeFelice v. ZONING BD. OF ADJ. OF BOROUGH OF POINT PLEASANT BEACHNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- State v. Farmland-Fair Lawn Dairies, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
4Cited by14 opinions
- Urban v. Planning BoardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- Aldrich v. SchwartzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- Berninger v. Board of AdjustmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Gandolfi v. Town of HammontonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Urban v. Planning Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.