Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Sorensen v. State Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1933No. 28622PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

This appeal involves the classification of claims against an insolvent state bank. Intervener sought allowance of two claims, with a- classification of deposits “not otherwise secured.” The trial court allowed them as general claims. Intervener has appealed.

The record discloses that the State Bank of Omaha had been duly designated as a depository for the funds of the city of Omaha and also for the funds of the county of Douglas. To secure the city funds, the bank gave a depository bond, with intervener, New Amsterdam Casualty Company, as surety, the bank paying the premium *493for the bond. A…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hubbell Bank v. BryanNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State ex rel. Cone v. BaumanNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  3. State ex rel. Sorensen v. First State Bank of AllianceNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  4. State ex rel. Sorensen v. First State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sorensen v. South Omaha State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Pure Oil Co. v. State Ex Rel. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Shumway v. Department of BankingNebraska Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API