Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Krassin v. Moskowitz

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 5, 1931PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is an action of contract to recover a deficiency on a note alleged to be due after a foreclosure by the plaintiff of the mortgage on real estate by which the note was secured. The good faith of the plaintiff in conducting the foreclosure sale of the mortgage was in issue. There was testimony that the foreclosure sale was advertised in accordance with law. Although not expressly stated, it is inferable that the plaintiff or some one in her interest purchased the property at the sale. There is no evidence in the record touching the number of persons present or the number of bids made at…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clark v. SimmonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  2. Bon v. GravesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. McCarthy v. SimonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Drinan v. NicholsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  5. Kavolsky v. KaufmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sandler v. SilkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Cambridge Savings Bank v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Ruebeck v. Attleboro Savings Bank (In Re Ruebeck)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1985
  4. Poorvu v. WeisbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Atlas Mortgage Co. v. TebaldiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API