Siesta Cafe v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Jim Johnson, Associate Justice.
This is a civil action brought by the Prosecuting Attorney to have the appellant’s place of business declared to be a public nuisance. Ark. Stats. (1947) § 34-101 et seq. The trial court found the place to be a nuisance and entered an order directing that it be closed until further orders of that court and that appellant be restrained and enjoined from such further operation of said place or the maintenance of the nuisances found to exist; and such judgment is challenged by this appeal.
The establishment in question, known as the ‘ ‘ Siesta Cafe”, is situated on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Walsh v. FairheadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- Alston v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Lawson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- Futrell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
3Cited by1 opinion
- Vandergriff v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965