Legal Opinion

Hague v. Hague

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1916PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Clackamas: James U. Campbell, Judge. Statement by Mr. Chief Justice Moore. This suit was commenced June 21, 1911, in tbe Circuit Court for Clackamas County,- Oregon, by Tb.om.as O. Hague against Anna E. Hague for a divorce.

Read the full summary

From Clackamas: James U. Campbell, Judge. Statement by Mr. Chief Justice Moore. This suit was commenced June 21, 1911, in tbe Circuit Court for Clackamas County,- Oregon, by Tb.om.as O. Hague against Anna E. Hague for a divorce. Tbe affidavit of the plaintiff, for the service of the summons* omitting the subscription, verification and filing, reads: “State of Oregon, County of-, ss.: “I, T. O. Hague, being duly sworn, say: That I am the plaintiff in the above-entitled suit,- that tbe complaint in said action was filed with the clerk of said court on the - day of May, 1911, and summons…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moore.

The evidence shows that the parties were married in Queens (now Nassau) County, New York, November 19, 1868, and nine children were born of that union. The pleadings admit and the evidence shows that on December 29, 1906, the plaintiff commenced a suit for divorce in Klamath County, Oregon. The defendant then was, and ever since has been, a resident of New York, and the summons was served by publication. She filed an answer in that suit, and made application for an allowance of suit money. The court ordered him to pay $125, but upon his refusal to comply…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Russell v. RussellSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  2. Hague v. HagueOregon Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API