Fronczak v. State

Appellant was prosecuted on an affidavit in three counts in which he was charged with various violations of the prohibition law. He was found guilty on count two of the amended affidavit of maintaining a common nuisance, which offense is defined in §20 of ch. 4 of the Acts of 1917, §8356t Burns’ Supp. 1921. Overruling his motion for a new trial and overruling his motion in arrest of judgment are assigned as errors.

The causes for a new trial are that the finding of the court is not sustained by sufficient evidence and that the finding is contrary to law. Appellant’s brief does not comply with…