Legal Opinion

Aspinook Corp. v. Commissioner of Corporations & Taxation

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 13, 1950PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, C.J.

An appeal describing the appellant as in the foregoing caption was taken to the Appellate Tax Board from the refusal of the commissioner to abate an excise tax assessed in the year 1948 to, and paid by, Arnold Print Works, Inc., under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 63, §§ 39, 44, as most recently amended by St. 1936, c. 362, §§ 6, 7. Arnold Print Works, Inc., was a foreign corporation organized under the laws of Delaware. It operated a factory at Adams in this Commonwealth. On November 19, 1948, that corporation filed with the commissioner a proper application for abatement of the tax. § 51. On December…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Helvering v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Hamilton Manufacturing Co. v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. Dunham v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Worcester County National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  5. Argenbright v. Phoenix Finance Co. of IowaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Becton, Dickinson & Co. v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Good Will Distributors (Northern), Inc. v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. National Dairy Products Corporation v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. Newmarket Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1955
  5. Cabot Corp. v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API