Legal Opinion · Dissent

Comite De Jornaleros De Redondo Beach v. City of Redondo Beach

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 9, 2010No. 06-55750, 06-56869Published

1DissentWardlaw, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding that the Redondo Beach (“City”) ordinance is a valid time, place, and manner restriction upon speech occurring on the City’s sidewalks and other public ways — the most traditional of public fora. In the words of Redondo Beach City Attorney Gordon C. Phillips, who recommended the ordinance’s adoption to the City’s Mayor and Council Members, the ordinance “prohibits any person from soliciting from the street ‘employment, business or contributions’ from occupants of vehicles.” The ordinance is facially over-broad and thus violates…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API