Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Froehlich

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 3, 1954PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STANLEY, Commissioner.

The appeal is from a judgment rendered upon a verdict for the defendants, James K. Froehlich and wife, in a suit upon their promissory note given the appellant, Louise Haynes, for $2,655 credited by several payments, which reduced the amount claimed to $1,938.75, with interest.

The attorney for the appellees, H. Randolph Kramer, has not filed a brief, although he has been repeatedly requested to do so. Under this condition we accept the appellant’s statements of the case without examining the record. RCA 1.260; Skaggs v. Ohio Valley Rock Asphalt Co., 292 Ky. 758, 166…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Skaggs v. Ohio Valley Rock Asphalt Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  2. Citizens Nat. Bank of Glasgow v. DamronCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  3. Silver v. Overhead Door Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  4. Davis v. PoulusCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Murphy v. TorstrickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1958
  2. Campbellsville Lumber Co. v. WinfreyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1957
  3. Belcher v. ElkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1961
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Gamaliel Farm Supply, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API