Legal Opinion

Piascik v. Cleveland Museum of Art

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided December 2, 1976No. C76-155PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION

MANOS, District Judge.

On February 17, 1976 plaintiff Helen Piascik, a woman, initiated an action charging the defendant Cleveland Museum of Art with rejecting her application for employment because of her sex in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq.; 20 U.S.C. § 1681, et seq. 1 Plaintiff Piascik seeks a declaratory judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201-2202, injunctive relief, back pay, litigation costs including attorneys fees, and such other relief as the Court deems appropriate according to the power conferred upon it by 42 U.S.C. § 1988. Jurisdiction is invoked…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Arthur Ray PARHAM, Appellant, v. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  4. Motorola, Inc. v. McLainCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
  5. Trent v. PerrittDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. North Haven Board of Education v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. 19 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1720, 20 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,029 Romeo Community Schools v. United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare, and Susan K. Garrard, Defendant-IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  5. Islesboro School Committee v. CalifanoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API