Legal Opinion

Nader v. ABC Television, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 30, 2005No. Docket No. 04-5034-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be, and it hereby is, AFFIRMED.

Plaintiff Michael Nader brought various disability discrimination, contract, and tort claims against his former employer, ABC Television, after the network terminated his contract and refused to rehire him in the wake of his well-publicized arrest for selling cocaine to an undercover police officer. After reviewing his claims, we conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment for the defendant.

I. Disability…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Eternity Global Master Fund Limited v. Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York and Jpmorgan Chase BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  5. New York University v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mendenhall v. Hanesbrands, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2012
  2. Walder v. White Plains Board of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  3. Dickens v. Hudson Sheraton Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  4. Williams v. Mount Sinai Medical CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  5. 4KZ Incorporated v. DimashAli Creative Center LLPDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API