United States v. Sharif
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER
FEIKENS, District Judge.
Defendants have filed three motions with this Court. These motions include: (1) a motion for admission to bond, (2) a motion to dismiss and (3) a motion to exclude evidence. The government opposes all three motions. For the reasons below I reach the following conclusions:
• I DENY Defendants’ motion for admission to bond;
• I DENY Defendants’ motion to dismiss for violation of the speedy trial act provision or violation of the confrontation clause; and
• I DENY Defendants’ motion to exclude evidence.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
On February 10, 2004,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. SharifDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005