Legal Opinion

United States v. Sharif

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided December 3, 2004No. CIV. 04-80137PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER

FEIKENS, District Judge.

Defendants have filed three motions with this Court. These motions include: (1) a motion for admission to bond, (2) a motion to dismiss and (3) a motion to exclude evidence. The government opposes all three motions. For the reasons below I reach the following conclusions:

• I DENY Defendants’ motion for admission to bond;

• I DENY Defendants’ motion to dismiss for violation of the speedy trial act provision or violation of the confrontation clause; and

• I DENY Defendants’ motion to exclude evidence.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On February 10, 2004,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. SharifDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API