Legal Opinion

Papalas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 22, 1994No. 93-2966PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, Thalia Janet Papalas, pled nolo contendere to possession of cocaine, specifically reserving her right to appeal the denial of her motion to suppress the cocaine. Appellant argues on appeal that (1) the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion to suppress and, (2) the seizure of cocaine was beyond the scope of a valid frisk pursuant to section 901.151, Florida Statutes. We hold that the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion to suppress and reverse.

At 6:40 p.m. on April 22, 1993, Officer Van Nelson observed appellant stagger from the rear of a restaurant to First…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. L.D.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. M.A.H. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Erick Garcia-SandobalCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
  2. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. Peterson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API