McCallum v. McCallum

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in failing to set forth the factors it considered and the reasons for its denial of plaintiff’s application for maintenance (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [6] [b]; Ferlo v Ferlo, 152 AD2d 980). The record is sufficient, however, to enable us to review the court’s maintenance determination and make the necessary findings (see, Ferlo v Ferlo, supra).

We conclude that plaintiff is entitled to an award of maintenance. The parties were married for…