Axline v. Shaw
Supreme Court of Florida
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua •aaounty. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion of the «•■court.
1Opinion of the Court
Liddon, J.:
Appellants, who were complainants below, hied their Mil of complaint against the appellee (defendant below). The bill alleged, among- other things, that the *307complainant, Rachael A. Axline, was a riparian proprietor of a certain lot of land in Alachna county, which is fronted by Orange Lake, which is a navigable stream.” Said bill also alleged that said lot abuts upon the said lake; that said lake adjoins the same, and that said complainant was entitled as riparian owner to exclusive water privileges under, upon and over the waters of the said lake adjoining and in front of her said…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Storer v. FreemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
- Trustees of East Hampton v. . KirkNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- State v. Black River Phosphate Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1893
- Sullivan v. MorenoSupreme Court of Florida · 1882
- Rivas v. SolarySupreme Court of Florida · 1881
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Welder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Apalachicola Land & Development Co. v. McRaeSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
- Kendry v. State Road DepartmentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Panama Ice & Fish Co. v. Atlanta & St. Andrews Bay Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1916
- Padgett v. Central & Southern Fla. Flood Con. Dist.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.