People v. McDonald

Roman, J.,

dissents, and votes to affirm the judgment, with the following memorandum: I disagree with the majority’s determination that the Supreme Court should have granted those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress testimony regarding Ronald Seeram’s photographic and lineup identifications, and Jeff Clyne’s photographic *1031identification. For the reasons set forth below, I find that the People met their initial burden of establishing the reasonableness of the police conduct and the lack of undue suggestiveness with respect to these procedures, and the defendant…