Legal Opinion

Whisenhant v. Allen

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 3, 2009No. 04-15810PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a death penalty case in which petitioner-appellant, Thomas Warren Whi-senhant, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for federal habeas relief. Whisenhant raises four claims in this appeal: (1) his counsel was ineffective at his 1981 guilt phase trial for failing to present his only defense of insanity; (2) the state failed to disclose exculpatory evidence during the 1981 trial and a 1987 penalty phase trial; (3) the prosecutor’s closing argument at the 1981 trial was fundamentally unfair; and (4) the trial judge’s ex parte dealings with prosecutors…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Robert Wayne Holsey v. Warden, Georgia Diagonstic PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  3. Randolph v. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  4. Duckett v. McDonoughDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2010
  5. West v. AllenDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API