Legal Opinion

Watson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 7, 1941No. 29206Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION ROE REHEARING.

Gardner, J.

It is earnestly contended by the plaintiff in error that the decision of this court to the effect that the law as related to mutual combat does not involve the principle that deadly or dangerous weapons are usually or generally necessary is erroneous. We have examined the cases cited in the motion for rehearing, as follows: Ray v. State, 15 Ga. 223 (4, 5); Tate v. State, 46 Ga. 148, 158; Donalson v. State, 40 Ga. App. 360 (4) (149 S. E. 429); Abernathy v. State, 51 Ga. App. 452 (180 S. E. 753); Bailey v. State, 148 Ga. 401 (96 S. E. 862); Ison v. State, 154…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ray v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
  2. Tate v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  3. Shafer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  4. Shafer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  5. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API