Legal Opinion

Scott v. White

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 22, 1948No. [No. 137, October Term, 1947.]PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarbury, C. J.

The appellees, son-in-law and daughter of the appellants, owned a leasehold property, 523 Sanford Place, in Baltimore City. It is alleged in the bill of complaint that on May 1, 1941, they agreed with the appellants, complainants below, that if the appellants would move in the premises, bringing their household furniture and equipment and residing there for the remainder of their lives, and if Josephine Scott, one of the appellants, would do all the work, washing, ironing, cooking, marketing and other duties for the entire household, so that both of the appellees could be profitably employed,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boehm v. BoehmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
  2. Fitzpatrick v. MichaelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  3. Krauss v. LitmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  4. Reed v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. WheelerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007
  2. Tompkins v. SandeenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Besche v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  4. Abraham v. HarveyMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Cartwright v. GiacosaTennessee Supreme Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API