Legal Opinion

C.C. v. B.L.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 13, 2013No. 2120308PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Judge.

C.C., the paternal grandfather of L.L. (“the child”), appeals from a judgment of the Talladega Juvenile Court (“the juvenile court”) denying his dependency petition. We affirm the juvenile court’s determination that the child is not dependent and remand the cause for the juvenile court to dismiss the paternal grandfather’s petition.

Background

S.L., the mother, gave birth to the child either in June 2000 or in June 2001.1 The mother is incarcerated, and although T.C., the child’s alleged or presumed father, has previously sought custody of the child, he is no longer involved with…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte K.L.P.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  2. T.B. v. T.H.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  3. K.C.G. v. S.J.R.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  4. V.W. v. G.W.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  5. Zaden v. ElkusSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. H.C. v. S.L.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017
  2. M.D. v. S.C.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014
  3. M.G.D. v. C.B.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016
  4. H.C. v. S.L.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018
  5. H.C. v. S.L.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API