Nelson v. Russo
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. Defendant Ronald Russo appeals from the denial of his motion for relief from judgment. He asserts that the superior court erred when it upheld a ruling that allowed plaintiff Carroll Nelson to renew his aging judgment by motion instead of requiring a separate action on the judgment in accordance with 12 V.S.A. § 506. We reverse and remand.
¶ 2. The underlying facts are as follows. On February 11, 1998, the Washington Superior Court entered a default money judgment against defendant and in favor of plaintiff. When defendant thereafter failed to comply with the judgment, plaintiff filed a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Price v. LelandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Clymer v. WebsterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- Oxx v. Vermont Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- H&E Equipment Services, Inc. v. Cassani Electric, Inc. & Nicholas CassaniSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- Ayer v. Hemingway, Hemingway Construction and HarrisSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- Roy H.A. Watson III v. The Village at Northshore I Association, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- Aron C. Vance v. Miranda LockeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2022
- Flex-A-Seal, Inc. v. SaffordSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.