Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Russo

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 14, 2008No. 07-406PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Defendant Ronald Russo appeals from the denial of his motion for relief from judgment. He asserts that the superior court erred when it upheld a ruling that allowed plaintiff Carroll Nelson to renew his aging judgment by motion instead of requiring a separate action on the judgment in accordance with 12 V.S.A. § 506. We reverse and remand.

¶ 2. The underlying facts are as follows. On February 11, 1998, the Washington Superior Court entered a default money judgment against defendant and in favor of plaintiff. When defendant thereafter failed to comply with the judgment, plaintiff filed a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Price v. LelandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  4. Clymer v. WebsterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  5. Oxx v. Vermont Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. H&E Equipment Services, Inc. v. Cassani Electric, Inc. & Nicholas CassaniSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  2. Ayer v. Hemingway, Hemingway Construction and HarrisSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  3. Roy H.A. Watson III v. The Village at Northshore I Association, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  4. Aron C. Vance v. Miranda LockeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2022
  5. Flex-A-Seal, Inc. v. SaffordSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API