Legal Opinion
Kleckley v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 1, 2009No. 4D08-3706PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
We reverse the summary denial of appellant’s claim that his habitual sentence imposed for count two is illegal and remand for the attachment of record portions conclusively refuting his claim or for resentencing. See Bover v. State, 797 So.2d 1246, 1251 (Fla.2001). See also McNair v. State, 920 So.2d 111 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s other claim.
WARNER, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bover v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- McNair v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kleckley v. State of FloridaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2023
- Kleckley v. State of FloridaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2022
- Kleckley v. State of FloridaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2022