Legal Opinion
Litton Systems, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc., Defendant/cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 3, 1996No. 95-1242, 95-1311PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
87 F.3d 1559
39 U.S.P.Q.2d 1321, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9541
LITTON SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HONEYWELL, INC., Defendant/Cross-Appellant.
Nos. 95-1242, 95-1311.
United States Court of Appeals,
Federal Circuit.
July 3, 1996.
S. Leslie Misrock, Pennie & Edmonds, New York City, argued, for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Rory J. Radding, New York City, and Stanton T. Lawrence, III, Washington, D.C. Also on the brief was Frederick A. Lorig, Bright & Lorig, Los Angeles, California.
Gregory A. Long, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, Los Angeles, California, argued, for…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- California Costume Collections, Inc v. Pandaloon, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022