Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 29, 1998No. 74533PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RHODES RUSSELL, Presiding Judge.

The state filed this interlocutory appeal of the trial court’s order suppressing defendant’s videotaped confession pursuant to section 547.200 RSMo 1994. The state argues that the trial court erred in finding that defendant did not voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waive his Miranda rights. We agree, and reverse and remand the case for further proceedings.

Following defendant’s arrest on charges unrelated to the current prosecution, he was read Miranda warnings, which he waived. Defendant initially made an oral statement denying involvement in the murder…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. DeblerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. State v. PowellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  4. State v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. State v. HeyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. State v. FaruqiSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  3. State v. JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. State of Missouri v. Daaron HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Rickey BatesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API