Legal Opinion

Haworth v. Seevers Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 8, 1892PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Mahaska District Court. — Hon. J. K. Johnson, Judge. Action for personal injuries. There was a judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendants appeal. — ■

1Opinion of the CourtGrEANGEB, J.

The Seevers Manufacturing Company is a copartnership composed of Thomas and H. W. Seevers, and the general business of the firm is the manufacture of steam heaters, iron bridges, and various kinds of machinery, at Oskaloosa, Iowa. About the *767twenty-fifth day of March, 1886, in aid of its business,' the firm was engaged in the erection of a wooden building near its works, and the plaintiff, who is a boiler maker by trade, and a day laborer, was in the employ of the firm, and working on the building. Nor the purpose of putting the rafters in position a stage or scaffold was made on the upper…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cook v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Humpton v. P. F. Unterkircher & SonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  2. Newbury ex rel. Newbury v. Getchel & Martin Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  3. Foley v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  4. Cushman v. Carbondale Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. McQueeny v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API