Legal Opinion

Soto v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 19, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On May 16, 1986, the infant petitioner, four years old at the time, was crossing an intersection in Brooklyn, New York, when she was struck and injured by a hubcap which became dislodged from a vehicle. The identity of the vehicle and the owner and/or operator thereof are unknown and unascertainable, thus prompting the instant application pursuant to section 5218 of the Insurance Law. Since the facts herein are undisputed, the question of whether a cause of action exists against respondent Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation is an issue of law for the court, and it was error to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Government Employees Insurance v. GoldschlagerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  3. Diaz v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. Utica Mutual Insurance v. SpenningsbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. KillakeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Bajrami v. General Accident InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API