in the Interest of J. K.

RUFFIN, Presiding Judge.

The mother of J. K. and H. K. appeals the termination of her parental rights, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence.1 Because there was clear and convincing evidence to support the juvenile court’s decision to terminate the mother’s rights, we affirm.

On appeal from a termination of parental rights, we defer to the juvenile court’s findings of facts, and we affirm “if the record demonstrates that any rational trier of fact could have found by clear and convincing evidence that the parent’s right to custody has been lost.”2 Thus viewed, the evidence shows that on…