In re the Claim of Soroka
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtAur.isi, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which found (1) claimant was not totally unemployed during three periods making him responsible for reimbursement of benefits paid during said periods and (2) that statements made by claimant in obtaining benefits constituted willful misrepresentations subjecting him to a penalty in the form of reduction of future benefit rights. Claimant has worked as a carpenter for many years." In 1957, he and his wife purchased a 195-acre farm, they bought various farm machinery and *921stocked the farm with a dairy herd. The milk production…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re the Claim of EmeryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re the Claim of BaxterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975