Legal Opinion

Sonfield v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 1, 1968No. 15217PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment for the plaintiff in a suit on a promissory note. The principal question is whether the facts set out in the affidavits filed by the defendants in response to the motion for summary judgment establish a valid parol extension of the due date of the note, or raise an issue of fact as to such an agreement.

The two appellants filed virtually identical affidavits. In his affidavit Robert L. Sonfield, Jr., states that after the execution of the note sued on “it was mutually agreed between plaintiff, E. Rue Thomas, this affiant and George H.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hancock v. StacyTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Martin v. Fannin BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  3. Sonfield v. EversoleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Cummings v. Badger Lumber Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. West Texas Loan Co. v. MontgomeryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martin v. Commercial National Bank of BradyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API