Legal Opinion
D. K. Jensenius v. Texaco, Inc., Marine Department
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 19, 1981No. 80-1879PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TATE, Circuit Judge:
D. K. Jensenius appeals from an order of the district court staying his action for seaman’s pension benefits and wages under 46 U.S.C. § 596. The stay was granted pending resolution of Jensenius’s action in state court to recover damages for Texaco’s alleged breach of the labor agreement under which Jensenius was employed. Because it appears that the stay order is not appealable under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291-1292, we dismiss the appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction.
The stay order issued by the district court in this case is not appealable as a final order under 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mercury Motor Express, Inc. v. Norman C. BrinkeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Jackson Brewing Company v. Jack D. Clarke, Jr., D/B/A Clarke Distributing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Wallin v. KeeganCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
3Cited by13 opinions
- Miguel Antonio Aparicio v. Swan Lake, Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc., Third Party v. Panama Canal Company, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- DLB Energy Corp. v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Francis v. Forest Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Sea Lane Bahamas Limited v. Europa Cruises Corporation, Europa Cruise Line, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Ondimar Transportes Maritimos v. Beatty Street Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.