Legal Opinion

Martin v. Scott

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 1, 1915PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Marshall Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. W. W. Haralson. Trover by W. I. Scott as guardian of Mabel Ricketts and others, against John Martin for the conversion of certain crops. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPelham, P. J.

The complaint filed by the appellees, Mable, Sible, and Lila Ricketts, through their guardian, W. I. Scott, in the circuit court, contained two counts in trover, and trial was had on the issue tendered by the defendant’s (appellant’s) plea of the general issue. At the request of the appellees (Mable, Sible and Lila Ricketts for convenience will be hereinafter referred to as the appellees), the court gave the general charge in writing in their behalf, which was followed by a verdict and judgment in favor of the appellees, from which this appeal is prosecuted.

The evidence without conflict was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marks v. Robinson & LedyardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  2. Holman v. KetchumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  3. Southern Ry. Co. v. City of AttallaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  4. C. W. Zimmerman Mfg. Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. Jordan v. LindsaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jordan v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API