American Accident &Life Ins. v. American Pioneer Life Ins.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentJohn A. Fogleman, Justice
I share the views expressed by the Chief Justice. The contract involved was clearly one giving a controlling or preemptive right to an agency manager to produce substantially all insurance business for the insurer.
I feel that I should express my views on the means by which the majority reach a result permitting recovery under this contract. If the statute in question were designed only for protection of insurance companies, I would not feel so alarmed by a result which leads to its easy circumvention. Obviously, this statute was designed not only to protect uninformed investors but, more…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Trist v. ChildSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Hazelton v. SheckellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Kuhn v. BuhlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Smith v. DandridgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Forrest City v. OrgillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.