Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Pepsi-Cola Niagara Bottling Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 28, 1968No. 31907_1PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge:

This petition by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to review a decision of the Tax Court, 48 T.C. 75, annulling his determination of deficiencies in the income tax of Pepsi-Cola Niagara Bottling Corporation for 1961, 1962 and 1963, raises a nice, though narrow, question of the interpretation of § 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code defining what pension, profit-sharing and stock bonus plans qualify for deduction of contributions as provided in § 404. The statute, so far as here relevant, is set out in the margin.1

*391In November 1960 the Bottling Corporation, an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Gray v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Grenada Industries, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  4. Pepsi-Cola Niagara Bottling Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Loevsky v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
  2. Bernard McMenamy Contractor, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  3. American Bankers Association v. National Credit Union AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  4. Oakton Distributors, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
  5. Babst Services, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API