Legal Opinion

Andrew B. Bloom v. Melissa Peacock

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided November 19, 2012No. 11-14912UnpublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAY, Circuit Judge:

Andrew and Adele Bloom appeal the dismissal with prejudice of their Third Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim for which relief could be granted in an action alleging multiple violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and various state tort claims. The Blooms argue that the district court prematurely applied qualified immunity, that the various claims are sufficiently alleged, and that all claims are timely because the claims either relate back to Mr. Bloom’s initial complaint or are based on continuing torts. After oral argument, reviewing the record, and for the reasons…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  5. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. C.P. ex rel. Perez v. Collier CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2015
  2. Navarro v. City of Riviera BeachDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2016
  3. Herman Hoffman, Jr. v. Houston Society for the PreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  4. McKally v. PerezDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
  5. de Veloz v. Miami-Dade CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API