Legal Opinion

Burris v. Burris

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 20, 1982PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant has petitioned for reconsideration of her motion for rule on the clerk to lodge the transcript. The record was refused by the clerk, and appellant’s motion for a rule denied by us, because Notice of Appeal was not timely filed. Appellant urges that we treat the failure as an unavoidable casualty, which we have done on occasion when the record was unavoidably tendered out of time. However, the rule of unavoidable casualty applies to the lodging of the record on appeal and not to the failure to file Notice of Appeal, the latter being jurisdictional. City of Hot Springs v. McGeorge…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Hot Springs v. McGeorge Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  2. Ward v. Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1957

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Williams v. Luft Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
  3. Mullins v. VarnerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Novak v. J.B. Hunt TransportCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API