Legal Opinion

Wilber v. Robinson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 6, 1888PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Barton Circuit Court, Hon. D. P. Stratton, Judge. Statement of case by the court. This suit is brought to require defendant to render an account of his stewardship as plaintiff’s attorney in legal matters in which she had theretofore employed him. The judgment was for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Barton Circuit Court, Hon. D. P. Stratton, Judge. Statement of case by the court. This suit is brought to require defendant to render an account of his stewardship as plaintiff’s attorney in legal matters in which she had theretofore employed him. The judgment was for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. The case was submitted on an agreed statement of facts, by which it appeared that, in August, 1874, defendant, being a practicing attorney, received a letter from plaintiff inquiring about the foreclosure of a mortgage held by her on lands in Barton and Yernon counties, to which…

1Opinion of the Court

Ellison, J..

From the agreed facts set forth in the *166statement of this canse, it appears that defendant has not been gnilty of any fraud on plaintiff, but, on the contrary, his conduct has evidenced good faith throughout. It further appears that the land, though since of greater value, brought the best price obtainable at the sale. It also appears that defendant informed plaintiff, in May, 1876, that he had bid in the land, but would deed it to her if she so desired, she, of course, paying the expenses, costs, etc. She replied to this letter, but sent no money and onl/ complained of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ward v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Aultman, Miller & Co. v. LoringMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API