Legal Opinion

Lashify, Inc. v. Pro Lash, Inc., et al

District Court, D. Utah

Decided January 6, 2026No. 2:24-cv-00016Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION LASHIFY, Inc., MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING [88] JOINT Plaintiff MOTION TO AMEND PROTECTIVE ORDER AND ENTERING PLAINTIFF’S v. VERSION OF THE AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER PRO LASH, Inc., et al, Case No. 2:24-cv-00016-HCN-CMR Defendants. Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero This matter is referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) (ECF 12). Before the court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Amend Protective Order (Motion) (ECF 88). The court finds that oral argument is not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Deutsche Bank Trust Co. AmericasCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  2. Front Row Technologies, LLC v. NBA Media Ventures, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API