Lashify, Inc. v. Pro Lash, Inc., et al
District Court, D. Utah
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION LASHIFY, Inc., MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING [88] JOINT Plaintiff MOTION TO AMEND PROTECTIVE ORDER AND ENTERING PLAINTIFF’S v. VERSION OF THE AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER PRO LASH, Inc., et al, Case No. 2:24-cv-00016-HCN-CMR Defendants. Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero This matter is referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) (ECF 12). Before the court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Amend Protective Order (Motion) (ECF 88). The court finds that oral argument is not…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re Deutsche Bank Trust Co. AmericasCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Front Row Technologies, LLC v. NBA Media Ventures, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015