Legal Opinion
United States v. Mohr
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 6, 2009No. 08-60075PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge:
Defendant-appellant William Fredrick Mohr (“Mohr”) appeals the sentence imposed after he pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. Mohr argues that the district court erred in finding that a prior South Carolina conviction for stalking was a “crime of violence” for the purposes of sentence enhancement under § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A) of the federal Sentencing Guidelines. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.
I
Mohr was convicted on a guilty plea of knowingly possessing ammunition in and affecting commerce, having…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Begay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Eddie LipscombCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Victor Hagman, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Valentin Carrasco-TerceroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.