Legal Opinion

Harley-Davidson Motor Co. v. Springettsbury Township

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 30, 2014No. 39 MAL 2014 (Granted)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

AND NOW, this 30th day of July, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are

1. Whether the trial court properly considered reasonably foreseeable hypothetical ways in which the property could be used by potential buyers to determine what a willing buyer would pay for the property consistent with the holdings in Craftmaster Mfg., Inc. v. Bradford County Board of Assessment Appeals, 903 A.2d 620 (Pa.Cmwlth.2006) and Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. v. Board of Assessment Appeals of Lehigh County, 720 A.2d 790 (Pa.Cmwlth.1998)?

2. Whether…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. v. Board of Assessment AppealsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Craftmaster Manufacturing, Inc. v. Bradford County Board of Assessment AppealsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harley-Davidson Motor Co. v. Springettsbury TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Harley-Davidson Motor Co. v. Springettsbury TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API