Legal Opinion
General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Musick
Texas Supreme Court
Decided May 13, 1964No. A-9922PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORVELL, Justice.
The trial court sustained petitioner’s motion for summary judgment. The Court of Civil Appeals reversed. 1 We sustain peti tioner’s second point contained in its application for writ of error which asserts that:
“The Court of Civil Appeals erred in reversing and remanding because respondent’s general denial and affidavit in answer to petitioner’s motion for summary judgment, even if considered, did not create any issues of fact as between respondent and petitioner.”
Accordingly the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is reversed and the judgment of the trial court affirmed.
Ge…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Southwestern Fire & Casualty Company v. LarueTexas Supreme Court · 1963
- Fort Smith v. Fairbanks, Morse CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1907
- J. B. Colt Co. v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Martin v. Auto Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Musick v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1963
3Cited by9 opinions
- Medina v. SherrodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Jones v. Houston Materials CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Bruce v. McAdooCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Lewis v. Ada Employees Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- City National Bank in Wichita Falls v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.