Legal Opinion

People v. Schultz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1946No. Docket No. 75, Calendar No. 43,049PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

The defendant, on leave granted, appeals from a sentence upon conviction by a jury in the recorder’s court of Detroit for receiving stolen goods exceeding $30 in value, knowing the same to have been stolen, under section 535 of the Michigan penal code, Act No. 328, Pub. Acts 1931 (Comp. Laws Supp. 1940, § 17115-535, Stat. Ann. § 28.803), as amended by Act No. 11, Pub. Acts 1941. (The 1941 amendment [Comp. Laws Supp. 1945, § 17115-535,-Stat. Ann. 1946 Cum. Supp. § 28.803], referring to' third conviction, has no bearing on the case.) The first and only important question urged for reversal is…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. People v. GarbuttMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. People v. HawthorneMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. People v. MeadMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. People v. CoveleskyMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. People v. McArronMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. MorrinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. People v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People v. LarcoMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  4. People v. BorowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  5. People v. KingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API