Legal Opinion

Seisek v. Blaw-Knox Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 1960No. Appeal, 45PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

The appellant in this case was denied workmen’s compensation.

The Workmen’s Compensation Board in denying him compensation found that “The claimant has failed utterly in his affirmative burden to prove an accident,” and noted that, “The referee was tolerant and more than indulgent in affording the claimant every opportunity to prove his claim.”

Upon appeal to the County Court of Allegheny County, President Judge Bencher carefully, ably and patiently reviewed the contentions of the claimant in an exhaustive opinion in which he stated, “There is no proof of accidental…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Walsh v. Penn Anthracite Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Dindino v. Weekly Review Publishing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Logan v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Iezzi v. Creamer Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Baur v. Mesta Machine Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API