Midland Valley Railroad v. Skinner
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Sebastian Circuit Court, Greenwood District; Daniel Hon, Judge;
1Opinion of the Court
Frau^nthau, J.
This was an action to recover the value of a horse which appellee alleged was negligently killed by the appellant in the operation of one of its trains. The jury returned a verdict in favor of appellee. There are three assignments of error made why the judgment should be reversed:
' (1) That there was not sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict; (2) because error was committed in permitting the introduction of certain testimony; and (3) because the court erred in refusing to give an instruction requested by appellant.
The case, briefly stated, is this: Between 2 and 3 o’clock…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- L. R. & F. S. R. R. v. PayneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
- Ware v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Railway Co. v. SageleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Ry. Co. v. VincentSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880
- Little Rock & Fort Smith Railway Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chenault v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Fenton v. De Queen & Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Kepp's Express & Van Co. v. BoydIndiana Court of Appeals · 1928